Plato, Machiavelli Essay

Machiavelli says the prince only has to seem good, not be good. Plato insists that seeming is bad, being is good. Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that human ar brutal, selfish, and fickle while Plato was an wishful thinker who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled all told over the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his soak up the philosopher-king was in charge of making the say a utopia in that everyone had his/her place and all worked together for the common good of the state.Machiavelli say that this was a foolish idea. Machiavelli philosophy of political science was centered on the rule. He believed the king, or despot, had the right to do whatever was necessity for his own gain, or whatever the milkweed butterfly considered the good of the state which he called virtu. Machiavelli believed the only purpose for a ruler was to make war, and protect its citizens from attacks b y early(a) states. He advocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in array to crush hopes of revolution even rationalizing that it was charge the risk of revolution should it anger the people.Machiavelli believed a ruler should be immoral development deception and illusion for power and never allowing the people to know the real him In Machiavellis time, as it is today, the States whole argue for being was to serve the citizens. The ruler, on that pointfore, is justified in doing whatever is necessary to master(prenominal)tain the state or state, even if it is unjust. In Platos time, man served the state. According to the viewed that ethics and regime are the same, or at to the lowest degree co-terminous. There was no distinction amidst private life and public life, as there is today.Plato argues a ruler give notice never be unjust. Plato argues against this type of ruler, who rules unaccompanied by might. Plato tries to prove that it is always make better to be just than unjust , claiming that there is a strong connection surrounded by judge , personal happiness and the swell up being of the state. Machiavelli underlines the fact that moral principles are not necessarily connected with the dexterity of the act of ruling . If the principles of morality and justice necessity to be broken in for the state to be prosperous , than this is how things should be done.In the end, Plato and Machiavelli lived very different lives, lend to their differing thoughts on the world. Plato grew up in the speed aristocratic class but was adopted by Socrates. As he followed Socrates, he learned all he would need for his later life as a philosopher when he essentially wandered close to Greece without pay. In this way he was untouched by wealths corruption. Machiavelli, on the other hand, grew up in a slopped Italian home and lived well supplied for by his patrons. The wealth that he was accustomed to was the main cause for his philosophy centered arou nd personal gain.